Follow us:
Subscribe to our newsletter

logo

  • News
  • Projects
  • Business and Finance
  • Innovation
  • Products and Services
  • Events
  • Online Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home
  • News
  • Projects
  • Business and Finance
  • Innovation
  • Products and Services
  • Events
  • Online Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Quotes by TradingView

APPEA believes more gas will reduce prices, not new regulation

04 Sep, 2018
135
Stock image courtesy of Marco Verch on Flickr


The Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA) have warned that the Federal Labor Party’s proposal for permanent controls on Australia’s gas exports will not lower long-term domestic gas prices, and instead additional regulation and political uncertainty risks deter investment in new gas supply which, over time, will lead to higher prices.

“Like manufacturers, gas producers compete in a tough global market and understand the pressures to stay competitive. However, trying to regulate prices does not tackle the real problems – the rising cost of producing gas and tightening local supply in Victoria and New South Wales,” said APPEA Chief Executive Dr Malcolm Roberts yesterday morning.

Mr Roberts said the only effective way to put downward pressure on gas prices will be to create additional supply from more suppliers. That supply needs to be local supply to avoid customers paying significant shipping costs. In the same announcement, APPEA also said there is no justification for the government to apply export controls in 2019 and no justification for making controls, with a permanent price trigger.

This comes after a report from the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO)’s, released in June this year, which forecasts little to no expected supply gaps until 2030. The findings were also similar in the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)’s July 2018 Gas Market Inquiry 2017-2020.

“The export controls introduced last year were not needed to ensure supply in 2018 and will not be needed in 2019 or into the future,” Mr Roberts said, “unless new gas resources in New South Wales and Victoria are developed, families and businesses in those states will pay more than those in states continuing to develop new supply.”

APPEA has outlined several measures proposed by the Labor Party that they believe require further discussion:

  • A decision to make the export controls permanent should be informed by the findings of the scheduled review in 2020. Making export controls permanent will compound the already significant level of sovereign risk created by the Australian Domestic Gas Security Mechanism, affecting more than $250 billion invested in Australia by both domestic and foreign investors. It sends an alarming signal to investors considering future investment in Australia.
  • References to a ‘benchmark price’ from the ACCC’s December 2017 report are out-of-date and misleading. The ACCC found, in its most recent (July 2018) report “… domestic price offers have reduced substantially and converged with export parity (LNG netback) prices at Wallumbilla”.
  • More broadly, the ACCC has consistently cautioned that gas prices are influenced by many factors and these factors change over time. Factors include the cost of transportation, the cost of gas production, the ‘non-price’ terms customers request in their gas supply agreement and the role of domestic short-term gas trading markets.
  • It is unclear what ‘new powers’ the ACCC requires. The ACCC is already actively monitoring the gas market and providing regular reports through its Gas Market Inquiry 2017‑2020 and has significant powers through the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 to act against any anti-competitive behaviour it observes in any market across the Australian economy.
  • Proposals to strengthen ‘use it or lose’ provisions appear unnecessary and potentially counterproductive. A recent review for the COAG Energy Council found “… no evidence that gas is being withheld (or warehoused) from development and production …” and “… to apply a use‑it-or-lose-it policy to deliver downstream objectives risks longer-term investment distortions and higher prices”.

Related Articles

activities

Natural gas energises Western Australia to another budget surplus

Woodside and BHP

To be ship shape Australia’s new fleet must be geared for gas

M&A deal activity in the oil and gas industry declined by 41% in Q1 2022

Surat Gas Project

Arrow Energy fined for breaches to land access framework

Comments

Leave a comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

all news all projects

Latest Posts

  • Latest News
  • Latest Projects
16 Jun

Microfossils provide clues about Australia’s petroleum potential

15 Jun

AEMO makes unprecedented decision to suspend energy market

15 Jun

Wage rises to be felt, but lack of skilled workers a bigger issue

15 Jun

Sanctions weaken oil and gas construction pipeline in Eastern Europe

15 Jun

WA-designed offshore inspection system pushes frontier of robotics

17 Jun

Esso Australia starts technical tender for Bass Strait decommissioning

17 Jun

Study to check feasibility of turning Torrens Island into a hydrogen hub

17 Jun

AXP energy boosts production with low-cost well re-completion in the US

15 Jun

bp to lead and operate WA renewables and green hydrogen energy hub

15 Jun

Partners to develop offshore renewable green hydrogen production

Online Magazine

    Current Cover
  • Login
  • Subscribe

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter or print magazine

Our Titles

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy
© Sage Media Group 2022 All Rights Reserved.
×
Authorization
  • Registration
 This feature has been disabled
 This feature has been disabled until further notice, however you may still register
×
Registration
  • Autorization
Register
* All fields required